I am still readjusting to
my summer routine at home in Galilee. I have no choice in subscribing to
‘Al-Ittihad,’ the only Arabic daily in the country. It is delivered to my front
door whether I pay my subscription or not. And I do subscribe to the International
New York Times mainly for the sophisticated four-dimensional Sudoku and the
Jumble puzzle. With that comes the English Haaretz, selective and sanitized for
English readers as I presume it is. I scan all three papers over a fresh cup of
hazelnut drip coffee for a break from my morning writing routine. A constant
supply of the scented delight is courtesy of dear friends in Hawaii. It usually
works wonders in transforming one to the idyllic mood of vacationing in Hawaii.
But it is a bitch to read
the news here; it is not about the surf on North Shore: “The people behind BDS
are ‘the people responsible for 9/11, for the terror attacks in Madrid and
London, and for the 250,000 people already killed in Syria,’ Yair Lapid, an
Israeli ‘centrist’ opposition leader, tells a NY synagogue,” says one news item.
I know I am innocent of all such accusations. Still, I add this one to the list
of cautionary notes in the back of my mind; it is my responsibility to prove my
innocence to my Jewish friend who will visit me later today. BDS sounds like
Ebola. Would my sympathies with the movement cause him to die?
As if to confirm the
guilt feeling gnawing at my subconscious another item speaks of the impending
change in Israeli law that will do away with the need for prosecutors of
Palestinian children accused of stone throwing to prove any intention to do
harm to Israeli soldiers. Essentially, this will free the Israeli occupying
forces from the standard procedure of extracting an admission of ill intent
from Palestinian children. Everyone accused of such act will receive an
automatic ten-year sentence. If you stop to think about it, this is a significant
gesture of benevolence on Israel’s part. It frees the children, usually
abducted from their beds at ungodly hours of the night, from the routine
beatings to obtain those admissions of “intent to harm.” And the new law
reduces the period from 20 to a mere 10 years in Israeli military prisons. Think
of the benefits that accrue to the kids on the way, a free rounded education:
you learn Hebrew from your jailors and the basic tenants of Islamic religion
from jailed Hamas functionaries.
And there is the snippet
I had already seen on Facebook: Israeli police train their dogs, usually German
shepherds (I know every thing Germans is bad for Jews but these are mainly for
use against Arabs) to attack the source of any cry of “Allahu akbar!”—God is great, one of the most commonly used phrases
in the Arabic language. It is a compulsory part of a Moslem’s prayer routine.
By my calculation, Moslems are required to repeat “Allahu akbar” 102 times a
day at a minimum during their five prayer sessions. Just imagine an army
division with their trained dogs passing by a mosque at prayer time. And you
automatically blurt out the phrase anytime you are upset by something you see
or hear. Here, for example, I find it hard to refrain from asking for God’s
wrath to be poured on the infidels’ heads by shouting “Allahu akbar!” myself.
One has to be very careful though. Not long ago a religious Jew with
questionable mental faculties decided to test the system’s alertness by shouting
the Islamic phrase at Jerusalem’s Wailing Wall and was shot on the spot by a
vigilant guard.
It is beyond my ability,
intellectually and emotionally, to recount all the upsetting news I read at one
sitting. But some have a unique flavor that causes one to drool were they not
so stupid. Take for example the headline spread across the entire front page:
Aida Touma Heads the Parliamentary Committee on the Status of Women. Then in smaller
letters the clearly bragging statement that she is the first Arab ever to head
a parliamentary committee. How many committees does the Knesset have? And how
many sessions has the Israeli parliament had? We are talking of hundreds if not
thousands of opportunities for such a precedent to be set. No one seems to have
the intellectual courage or honesty to ask the question, not among the slighted
20% minority or among the aggressor majority. And this is the democracy stick
with which Israel defenders hit us over the head every time we complain: Israel
is a democracy and you have the right to vote.
At a lecture last night,
my friend Gideon Levy expressed his support for the one-state solution for the
Israel-Palestine conflict. “It is already one state. What is left is to
struggle for equal rights for all who reside between the river and the sea.” To
illustrate the daunting nature of the challenging task facing all of us
believers in the one-state cause he mentioned the fact that Mekurot, the
Israeli water supply company, charges Palestinians in the occupied West Bank
five times what it charges settlers there. The obvious solution is to end
occupation and demand equality for occupied Palestinians by granting them
citizenship. Except that now I read in the paper that on average the Ministry
of the Interior grants Jewish citizens of Israel five fold what it grants Arab
citizens in budgetary support to their respective local authorities.
Gideon, it is your
ethnicity, not your citizenship that makes the difference.
We are talking not of
Palestinians under occupation but of those of us who were “liberated” nearly
seven decades ago to be among the first citizens of the state. But “our” state
has defined us out of its Jewish essence. We are no longer even fit to be its
“hewers of wood and carriers of water,” witness its continued importation of
foreign labor while our unemployment rate sores in the double-digit range. The
news from China is that it will not permit its citizens to be employed in the
OTs. The commentators are outraged by this ‘political’ move. My own
interpretation is that it is tit for tat. It is in response to the new rule
that Israel is imposing on members of the imported Chinese labor force. They,
almost exclusively men, are now required to sign a binding document, a pledge
to abstain from sex while in Israel. Standard racial purity practices, you
know! It must feel good to be a Palestinian laborer from the Occupied
Territories in comparison, at least in consideration of quelling basic sexual
urges even when there is little difference in terms of anatomical structures.
At least you get to escape from the temporary shacks you construct as shelters
at the construction sites and go home once a month to
practice sex with your own kind, even at the risk of damaging the said tools,
what with climbing across barbwire fences and jumping over high walls with
glass shards.
It is enough to give one
a case of mortal despair, this Israeli democracy. Recently, at a lecture I gave
at a hospital in the USA I used the F-word in referring to the results of the
recent Israeli elections. A gentleman objected sharply saying: “You can’t mean
that. You can’t refer to anything in Israel as fascist.” I asked him what did
he call a country where at football games and political rallies calls of “Death
to Arabs’ ring out regularly and the system doesn’t bat an eyelash? He got up and
left in anger at my impudence. I want the creep to come and read the paper with
me right now. I want to rub his nose in it. Yes: F…! F…! F…!
No comments:
Post a Comment